http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,4-2007410346,00.htmlTime for one of Vicky's lackeys to claim EXCLUSIVE today. Not so much an exclusive as the lengthening of a story that already appeared in the Sunday Mirror three days ago. The print edition also carried the same photo that appears in today's Sun. The lackey manages to name the man (wow, three days to find that out - good sleuthing) and get a different "source". But this is hardly the stuff EXCLUSIVES are made of is it?
1 comment:
I love the line "Jamie, 34, of Hampshire, is not thought to have any criminal convictions".
'Is not thought to'? Isn't this the sort of thing which, if it's as important as the writer seems to think, they should find out for definite?
Post a Comment